Um die Website zu personalisieren und Ihnen den größten Mehrwert zu bieten, verwenden wir Cookies. Unter anderem dienen sie der Analyse des Nutzerverhaltens, um herauszufinden wie wir die Website für Sie verbessern können. Durch Nutzung der Website stimmen Sie ihrem Einsatz zu. Weitere Informationen finden Sie in unseren Datenschutzbestimmungen.



Cross-border teleworking: new criteria for assessing a permanent establishment risk

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Paris, Strasbourg | 03.02.2026

On November 18, 2025, the OECD adopted a new version of its commentary on Article 5 of its model tax convention, marking a key milestone for the characterization of permanent establishments in teleworking situations. These commentaries are particularly important for assessing the risk of permanent establishment in France, since to our knowledge there are no tax instructions in French law specifying the criteria for qualifying a permanent establishment in the case of home office.

S_photocase_2575307.jpg 

Previously (2017 OECD Model), a home office created a tax risk if it was used continuously and was at the disposal of the company. The difficulty was determining in which cases the office could be considered at the disposal of the company. This framework proved unsuitable in a situation where remote working is becoming increasingly common.

The OECD now provides the following two criteria for qualifying a fixed place of business:

  1. The home office (or any other relevant location) must be used on a continuous basis: the remote worker must spend at least 50% of their working time there over a 12-month period.
  2. This physical presence must be motivated by a commercial reason (interactions with local customers, prospecting for local customers, access to on-site resources, etc.). A simple personal preference on the part of the employee is not sufficient.

However, if the 50% threshold is reached but there are no commercial reasons, other facts and circumstances may still qualify as a fixed place of business, particularly when an individual is the only person, or the main person, carrying out the business activity. A case-by-case analysis is therefore always essential.

 

Simplified examples cited by the OECD:


Case A

Teleworking for 3 consecutive months during a 12-month period

50% threshold not reached à no permanent establishment

Case B

Teleworking 1 to 2 days per week throughout a 12-month period

50% threshold not met à no permanent establishment

Case C

80% teleworking over a 12-month period + services provided regularly at local clients’ premises

50% threshold reached + proven commercial reason à existing permanent establishment

Case D

60% teleworking over a 12-month period + virtual local and non-local customer contacts with one local on-site visit per quarter

50% threshold met but no proven commercial reason à  no permanent establishment

Case E

Almost 100% teleworking + remote services provided to local and non-local customers in near real time, facilitated by the employee's local presence

50% threshold reached + proven commercial reason à existing permanent establishment


While these criteria are useful for assessing the risk of a permanent establishment, it should be noted that the OECD's comments are not binding on the tax authorities or French courts, whose position is still awaited. These changes also only concern the fixed place of business criteria. Other possible criteria for qualifying a permanent establishment (in particular the dependent agent) are not affected.

In conclusion, while this OECD update clarifies the criteria for assessing the risk of permanent establishment in the case of home office, it is still not binding on the French tax authorities or the tax courts. Therefore, despite the update to the OECD comments, companies must continue to verify in advance the potential impact of their employees' remote working projects outside the jurisdiction of their headquarters.

At the same time, issues relating to implications for labor law and social se​curity law (in particular applicable law) should also be analyzed.



Contact

Contact Person Picture

Christophe Jolk

Avocat, Attorney-at-law

Associate Partner

+33 6 10 87 92 17
+33 6 1087 9217

Anfrage senden

Contact Person Picture

Mélodie Blondeau

Avocate

Manager

+33 6 13 39 90 00

Anfrage senden

Befehle des Menübands überspringen
Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln
Deutschland Weltweit Search Menu